deniz.in

Markets

Weather

Loading weather

· via Hacker News – Front Page (native)

New SoC options may finally make Linux phones a viable third mobile platform

A new analysis argues that longer-lived SoC options, maturing mobile interfaces and growing restrictions on bootloader unlocking are making Linux phones a viable niche again.

New SoC options may finally make Linux phones a viable third mobile platform

Linux phones stalled badly after their 2020 moment, but a new long-form analysis by Amos Batto argues that the conditions which doomed the first wave are reversing, and that a small but genuine market for phones running standard Linux distributions is now possible. The piece, published on Batto's blog and currently on the front page of Hacker News, frames the shift the way desktop Linux eventually carved out a niche alongside Windows and macOS rather than displacing them.

Why the first wave stalled

Batto dates the high-water mark to 2020, when the Purism Librem 5 and PINE64 PinePhone shipped and mainstream channels paid attention: a Mrwhosetheboss video asking whether Linux smartphones would kill Android drew 7.8 million views, and Linus Tech Tips tried the devices. The PinePhone was ported to 20 distributions and the Librem 5 to Mobian and postmarketOS. Then momentum faded. He attributes the stagnation to weak silicon, since the available SoCs were not up to running a modern smartphone and the hardware industry offered no strong alternatives with free and open-source drivers, while mobile interfaces like Phosh and Plasma Mobile were still immature. The PinePhone Pro's problems and the Librem 5 refund situation wore down the community's willingness to gamble on the next device.

The SoC trade-off is loosening

The core dilemma, according to Batto, is that Linux-friendly SoCs built for single-board computers, set-top boxes, IoT and automotive use are weaker and less power-efficient because they are fabbed on older process nodes, but they stay available for long product cycles: cars contain dozens of chips that need to keep running for 20 years. Mobile SoCs are fast, yet they are produced for only one to three years. Batto argues that the Rockchip RK3588S changes this calculation for Linux phones, and that a Qualcomm IoT part opens a second new path. He also expects phones built on Android kernels to become more viable as support periods lengthen, while examining the problems that come with running an Android kernel inside what is otherwise a Linux phone.

The software side matured

Software, which Batto identifies as a major challenge for the Librem 5, is in far better shape today. Phosh has succeeded despite limited funding, KDE and GNOME adopted adaptive frameworks in Kirigami and Adwaita so applications can reflow between desktop and mobile layouts, and Waydroid runs Android apps inside a Linux container. The analysis also points to Linux distributions beginning to adopt mobile interfaces, and recounts PINE64's attempt to avoid the cost of developing its own mobile software stack.

Demand never fully disappeared

Batto counts 29 commercial mobile Linux varieties over the past 25 years, from the Sharp Zaurus, G.Mate Yopy and Motorola A760 through Maemo, MeeGo, Firefox OS, webOS, Tizen and Sailfish OS. The survivors live on quietly: Sailfish OS is maintained and sold on phones by Finland's Jolla Group, Ubuntu Touch survives under UBports volunteers after Canonical dropped it in 2017, webOS runs LG TVs and Tizen runs Samsung sets. More companies sell Linux phones today than five years ago — Purism, PINE64, FuriLabs, Jolla, Jolla-Devices, Volla and PrivacyPortal, with Brax expected to join — even though fewer people are buying than during the 2020-22 peak.

He also sees the wider industry closing off the AOSP-based alternative: bootloader unlocking is increasingly restricted, and Motorola's announced plan to sell high-end phones with GrapheneOS starting in 2027 suggests Google will tolerate mainstream alternatives, probably out of fear of antitrust regulation.

Why it matters

Batto's conclusion is that the remaining barrier is not technical but corporate, resting on the companies involved, and that three distinct types of Linux phone are now feasible. For users who want a phone they actually control, the argument matters because the mainstream escape hatches, such as unlockable bootloaders and AOSP derivatives, are being shut one by one, while the hardware and software needed for a credible Linux phone are finally converging.

  • #linux
  • #open-source
  • #mobile
  • #smartphones
  • #hardware

Related posts